The Merchant of Venice presents an interesting situation because it is hard to tell who Shakespeare intends the “bad guy” to be. Although Shakespeare is known for his understanding of why people do bad things, (such as racism or murder), Shylock is not necessarily portrayed as a victim in this play. When Antonio fails to pay his bond, Skylock is shown as the “bad guy” and they devise a plot to stop him. Although today we know that treating someone for his or her religious views is unreasonable, (even though it still happens a lot more than people think), I actually believe that Shakespeare did not write this play to show that. I believe he wrote this play for purely entertainment.
In the beginning Shylock is portrayed as a victim and we initially feel sorry for him because of how he is treated. To be honest though, as the play progressed he started to turn a little darker than I would have expected. I started reading this play waiting for some moral message on how people can mess up by wanting too much power, money, and love. At first I thought it was that racism is bad and that Jews were treated unfairly, but then after Shylock made his bond with Antonio he became a mean person. He wanted a pound of flesh, human flesh. That is not a nice thing to do regardless of how you are treated. Shakespeare began to show that “the Jew” was actually heartless and it puzzled me. So what is the point of the play? The closest thing to a message that I could find was that one should always cherish his loved one from the situation between Bassanio, Portia, and her ring.
After analyzing the play more closely, I came to the conclusion it was made purely for entertainment because even Antonio does not really learn his lesson for mistreating Shylock because he wins in the end! He defeats the “bad guy” and gets his money back because it turns out not all his ships were doomed. Also, another way Shylock is portrayed as the bad guy is with his situation with his daughter Jessica. He does not let her marry out of faith even though they are madly in love. This play made me distrust Shakespeare a little bit because he does not show that it is bad to be a racist. He allows Antonio and Bassanio to live happily ever after, while in the end only Shylock got scammed.
After much thought; however, I have come to the conclusion that Shakespeare did not mess up, but he indeed wrote a play for entertainment because of the time he lived in. He did not know what it was like to be accepting because in that era Jews were seen as bad people and they were separated in ghettos. To him it was normal, and therefore that is why he didn’t write The Merchant of Venice in order to sympathize but in fact to be funny and to attract an audience. I am disappointed in him because after following his works in our class, he has showed me that he really is a good person and understands the principle values that people should follow such as honesty, love, patience, and virtue. I did not enjoy this play as much because there was no distinct humane message that I could relate to.
Sunday, April 27, 2008
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
King Lear
Lear's oldest daughter Goneril is an evil woman who is willing to go to extremes to achieve her goals. She doesn’t let anything get in her way. Goneril pretends to love her father so he would give her a good portion of his kingdom. Right off the bat of the play portrays how she can be deceiving which sort of foreshadows her role in the play.
After gaining a large portion of her fathers land, she discarded Lear. She didn’t actually love her father, she just had a wanting for power. Her father was an annoyance to her. She banishes him and moves on like he never did anything for her. Her heartless cruelty becomes more and more apparent as the play progresses.
Goneril even plans to kill her own husband, the Duke of Albany as well as her sister Regan so she could be with Edmund. Goneril progresses to get what she wants through evil schemes and manipulation. She lies to her father for land, she lies to Albany to get a respected husband, and then she starts an affair with a bastard. Meanwhile, Lear is banished and going crazy. This cruelty and recklessness directly causes her death.
Goneril and Regan are personifications of evil because of their hunger for power. It is their hunger that drives them to do such foolish deeds. Ultimately, their poor embodiment of evil results in justfication, even though many innocent people are killing along the way such as Gloucester and Cordelia.
After gaining a large portion of her fathers land, she discarded Lear. She didn’t actually love her father, she just had a wanting for power. Her father was an annoyance to her. She banishes him and moves on like he never did anything for her. Her heartless cruelty becomes more and more apparent as the play progresses.
Goneril even plans to kill her own husband, the Duke of Albany as well as her sister Regan so she could be with Edmund. Goneril progresses to get what she wants through evil schemes and manipulation. She lies to her father for land, she lies to Albany to get a respected husband, and then she starts an affair with a bastard. Meanwhile, Lear is banished and going crazy. This cruelty and recklessness directly causes her death.
Goneril and Regan are personifications of evil because of their hunger for power. It is their hunger that drives them to do such foolish deeds. Ultimately, their poor embodiment of evil results in justfication, even though many innocent people are killing along the way such as Gloucester and Cordelia.
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Poem of da day
A Dream Of Death
I DREAMED that one had died in a strange place
Near no accustomed hand,
And they had nailed the boards above her face,
The peasants of that land,
Wondering to lay her in that solitude,
And raised above her mound
A cross they had made out of two bits of wood,
And planted cypress round;
And left her to the indifferent stars above
Until I carved these words:
i{She was more beautiful than thy first love,}
i{But now lies under boards.}
William Butler Yeats
I DREAMED that one had died in a strange place
Near no accustomed hand,
And they had nailed the boards above her face,
The peasants of that land,
Wondering to lay her in that solitude,
And raised above her mound
A cross they had made out of two bits of wood,
And planted cypress round;
And left her to the indifferent stars above
Until I carved these words:
i{She was more beautiful than thy first love,}
i{But now lies under boards.}
William Butler Yeats
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
The Battle of Wits
Much Ado About Nothing portrays a hilarious and ironic relationship between Benedick and Beatrice. The way Shakespeare makes them hate each other in the beginning makes their eventual love so much funnier. The relationship goes through many stages where they sort of fight, but I believe that they liked each other all along.
Benedick’s relationship with Beatrice in the beginning of the play reminds me much of a boy and girl that like each other in kindergarten. They bicker endlessly every time they see each other. It may be their way of showing like for one another. I think it represents a sort awkwardness between them considering they have been together before. The reason I think that is because of how the movie showed a specific scene of them fighting with all their wit. After being stung by an intense comment and Benedick walks off so he could claim victory. Beatrice becomes sad by Benedick’s “move” if you will and mutters under her breath that it is typical of him to walk away from a situation rather than fight it through. It shows some unhappiness and maybe shows that she still wants to be with him and wishes he could be open and honest rather than fighting every time they meet. If that were to ever happen they would need the help of an outside force.
Their feelings finally come out with the help of their friends. The work of Claudius, Leonato, and the Prince allow for Beatrice and Benedick to consider loving each other. With their help it gives Benedick and Beatrice the opportunity to come clean with their feelings. I think Shakespeare is showing a major idea about human nature. It is impossible to interact as humans in a positive way if the people don’t open their minds. Benedick and Beatrice finally speak openly and realize that they actually love each other. They went from saying that they will never die married” to celebrating love.
A relationship, being sexual or friendly, will never work without honesty. Even then it might still be too awkward to function properly. Shakespeare’s portrayal of Benedick’s and Beatrice’s comical bickering helps show us how to lighten up and be open to share our true feelings. An idea or tradition may be in the way of letting good things happen between people but all barriers must be shed if we are to truly be human.
Benedick’s relationship with Beatrice in the beginning of the play reminds me much of a boy and girl that like each other in kindergarten. They bicker endlessly every time they see each other. It may be their way of showing like for one another. I think it represents a sort awkwardness between them considering they have been together before. The reason I think that is because of how the movie showed a specific scene of them fighting with all their wit. After being stung by an intense comment and Benedick walks off so he could claim victory. Beatrice becomes sad by Benedick’s “move” if you will and mutters under her breath that it is typical of him to walk away from a situation rather than fight it through. It shows some unhappiness and maybe shows that she still wants to be with him and wishes he could be open and honest rather than fighting every time they meet. If that were to ever happen they would need the help of an outside force.
Their feelings finally come out with the help of their friends. The work of Claudius, Leonato, and the Prince allow for Beatrice and Benedick to consider loving each other. With their help it gives Benedick and Beatrice the opportunity to come clean with their feelings. I think Shakespeare is showing a major idea about human nature. It is impossible to interact as humans in a positive way if the people don’t open their minds. Benedick and Beatrice finally speak openly and realize that they actually love each other. They went from saying that they will never die married” to celebrating love.
A relationship, being sexual or friendly, will never work without honesty. Even then it might still be too awkward to function properly. Shakespeare’s portrayal of Benedick’s and Beatrice’s comical bickering helps show us how to lighten up and be open to share our true feelings. An idea or tradition may be in the way of letting good things happen between people but all barriers must be shed if we are to truly be human.
Monday, November 12, 2007
The Struggle to be Liked
The Ibo culture is not exactly the same as ours, yet it has many similar ideas. For one, it emphasizes the idea of hard work will lead to respect and riches. Everyone, no matter from what family, can work their way to the top such as Okankwo. The pressure to fit in with the successful people of the Ibo culture drive Okankwo to be meticulous about the many aspects of living a respectable life. He is in a constant struggle to follow the proper manners and etiquette to be viewed highly. Also, just like in America laziness is not tolerated and is viewed poorly. Key similarities in our culture make the Ibo people look way ahead of their time.
The Ibo stress a strong code of manners of etiquette that is quite impressive. The people focus on being hospitable and treat all their guests as if Gods. They treasure palm wine and the kola nut. They are seen as gifts of hospitality and respect. That tradition is in America today. For example, whenever my dad is invited to an important dinner he will probably take over a bottle of a wine as a sign of respect. It is amazing to see traditions last so long throughout history. Also, when the Ibo have guests they make them their favorite foods and put them in front of everything. It is the same as the present time. Typically, when people have guests, they act differently in order to keep them happy and they share with them. Although the Ibo people are not as strong as a force as before, their human traditions and values are ever so present.
Another similar and key comparison is the Ibo’s idea of a success. It is analogous to the “American dream”. That is that hard work and kind-heartedness will make a person highly viewed and honored. Just like in Ibo times, today being in debt, (such as Okwanko’s father), is seen poorly. People who depend on others rather than achieve their own success are never honored no matter what day and age they are living in. It is fascinating to see how humans, no matter what technological state they are in, will tend to want to achieve the same mold of being successful through hard work. These pressures and cultural ideals force people, such Okwanko, to try to achieve perfection. Some people succeed, others have problems such as how Okwanko is irrationally harsh on his kids to not be like his dad. The ideals, although seeking goodness, do not always fit for everyone.
The similarities between our culture and the Ibo culture help emphasize key, primal values of humans. When people shed off their labels such as Ibo or American or whatever, it is apparent that they are all looking for the same thing: to fit in. Okwanko’s character shows that beautifully as his dislike for his father drives him to be perfect.
The Ibo stress a strong code of manners of etiquette that is quite impressive. The people focus on being hospitable and treat all their guests as if Gods. They treasure palm wine and the kola nut. They are seen as gifts of hospitality and respect. That tradition is in America today. For example, whenever my dad is invited to an important dinner he will probably take over a bottle of a wine as a sign of respect. It is amazing to see traditions last so long throughout history. Also, when the Ibo have guests they make them their favorite foods and put them in front of everything. It is the same as the present time. Typically, when people have guests, they act differently in order to keep them happy and they share with them. Although the Ibo people are not as strong as a force as before, their human traditions and values are ever so present.
Another similar and key comparison is the Ibo’s idea of a success. It is analogous to the “American dream”. That is that hard work and kind-heartedness will make a person highly viewed and honored. Just like in Ibo times, today being in debt, (such as Okwanko’s father), is seen poorly. People who depend on others rather than achieve their own success are never honored no matter what day and age they are living in. It is fascinating to see how humans, no matter what technological state they are in, will tend to want to achieve the same mold of being successful through hard work. These pressures and cultural ideals force people, such Okwanko, to try to achieve perfection. Some people succeed, others have problems such as how Okwanko is irrationally harsh on his kids to not be like his dad. The ideals, although seeking goodness, do not always fit for everyone.
The similarities between our culture and the Ibo culture help emphasize key, primal values of humans. When people shed off their labels such as Ibo or American or whatever, it is apparent that they are all looking for the same thing: to fit in. Okwanko’s character shows that beautifully as his dislike for his father drives him to be perfect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)